Cable Franchising Quasi-Judicial Best Practices in Minnesota

Many cities in the Twin Cities Metro area have been approached by CenturyLink about submitting an application for a cable franchise. While receiving an application to provide competitive cable service may be an exciting prospect, it is important to recognize that, in Minnesota, the cable franchising process is quasi-judicial and certain procedural safeguards must be followed. Council Members/Commissioners should take measures to provide adequate safeguards for the due process rights of cable franchise applicants that will appear before them.

The following is a list of aspirational “best practices” that Council Members/Commissioners should consider using in connection with cable franchising matters over which they may have decision-making authority.

  • Maintain neutrality and impartiality at all times. An unbiased decision maker is required to meet the fundamental principles of due process.
  • Limit ex parte (discussions outside of the public hearing) communications with the franchise applicant.
  • In the event of ex parte communications with representatives of the applicant, document the communication and submit it into the official record of the public hearing.
  • Keep a record of all verbal or written contacts relating to the franchise application.
  • Refer questions, complaints, and information you receive on a cable franchise applicant to the department staff person responsible for the matter.
  • Submit the record of contacts, along with any documents received regarding the cable franchise application, into the official record of the proceedings.
  • Refrain from taking a position on the cable franchise application in community forums or elsewhere prior to the official City Council proceedings for such matters. This would include Twitter, Facebook and other social media outlets.
  • Seek legal advice if you have concerns about impartiality (i.e. financial or other personal interest in the decision).
  • Make quasi-judicial decisions based only on the formal record of the proceeding.
  • State the factual findings and reasons that support your quasi-judicial decisions on the record at the time that you make your decision.

Michael Bradley

Mike Bradley is a partner at Bradley Werner, LLC. Mike has spent nearly his entire 30+ year career representing local governments and access television organizations on cable television and telecommunications issues. Throughout that time, he has had the privilege of representing many of his clients continuously. Mike has received the highest attorney ratings from Martindale-Hubble and is admitted to practice in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Washington and in multiple federal courts, including the United States Supreme Court.

Recent Posts

California Court Upholds Tax on Video Streaming Services

A municipal voter-approved tax on video services was upheld to apply to video streaming revenues.…

2 months ago

Minnesota Local Governments Challenge FCC’s Authority on Broadband

A coalition of Minnesota local governments filed comments with the FCC, asserting that federal preemption…

4 months ago

Minnesota Cities Tell FCC it has No Authority over Broadband and Limited Authority to Preempt Telecom Regs

Earlier today a coalition of Minnesota Cities, including the League of Minnesota Cities, filed comments…

5 months ago

How to Access Cold Weather Rule Assistance in Minnesota

The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has announced that Cold Weather Rule protections are now…

7 months ago

New Pilot Reduces Electricity Costs in “Energy Burdened” Neighborhoods

Xcel Energy customers in certain Minnesota neighborhoods may soon see a reduction on their electric…

7 months ago

First Broadband Franchise Ushers in a New Era in Franchising

The South Washington County Telecommunications Commission has signed a pioneering broadband franchise agreement with Intrepid…

7 months ago

This website uses cookies.